Reduce meat consumption, reduce global warming

In the past, when I have asked the vegetarian and vegans I know why they choose not to eat meat, many of them advocate for animal rights. Others say they feel it is simply healthier and reduces their risk of heart disease and other illnesses. However, few of them say they stopped eating meat to reduce global warming. Yet, according to a study published by the University of Chicago, the average American does more to reduce global warming emissions by going vegetarian than by switching to a Prius.

As compelling as I found Michael Pollan's The Ominvore Dilemma, it's hard to overlook the fact that many of the recommendations he provides are not applicable to lower class individuals. Yet if we recognize the impact producing animals for meat has on the environment, it might become easier to get legislation to regulate factory farms and meat processing plants or provide support for increased accessibility to fresh fruits and vegetables. Hundreds of companies have responded to the increased awareness of climate change by providing eco-friendly products. Consumers are instructed to buy energy-saving light bulbs, water filters in lieu of bottled water, and products made of post-consumer waste and recycled materials. Perhaps one of the most significant changes a person can make to combat environmental degradation is reduce their meat consumption. According to a UN report, animal agriculture accounts for most of the water consumed in U.S., emits two-thirds of the world's acid-rain-causing ammonia, and is the world's largest source of water pollution. Hybrid cars may still seem like a luxury, but $100 for a CSA share is starting to look like a great deal.

What I ate Friday: watermelon, a Caprese sandwich, breakfast tacos with scrambled egg whites and Gimme Lean fake sausage

What I ate today: kiwi, a salad sampler from La Madeline (Caesar salad, fruit salad, vegetable soup), half a veggie burger with onion rings